IN RE: JOE CORONADO--Appeal from 117th District Court of Nueces County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-09-00483-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE JOE CORONADO On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1 Relator, Joe Coronado, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 21, 2009, through which he complains that the trial court erred in failing to rule on, and grant, his motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment reflecting the time credit to which relator is allegedly entitled. The Court requested a response from the real party in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and through the Criminal District Attorney of Nueces County, Texas. The real party in interest has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition 1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) ( W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so. ); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). for writ of mandamus. According to the motion, the matters in this original proceeding have been resolved and the petition has been rendered moot. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the parties are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED AS MOOT without reference to the merits thereof. PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 28th day of August, 2009. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
