IN RE: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES--Appeal from 214th District Court of Nueces County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-09-00352-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND DISABILITY SERVICES On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Relief. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1 Relator, Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief in the above cause on June 24, 2009. That same day, the Court ordered the real party in interest to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus and ordered the motion for emergency relief to be carried with the case. The real party in interest has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ 1 See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) ( W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ); T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). of mandamus. According to the motion to dismiss, the underlying lawsuit against relator has been nonsuited and thus, the original proceeding has been rendered moot. The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the real party in interest has shown herself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are hereby DISMISSED as moot. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 27th day of July, 2009. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
