RIVER RIDGE NURSING CENTER IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME, ET AL. v. GAYLYNNE NEMEC, INDIVIDUALLY, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CATHERINE PARKER, AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF CATHERINE PARKER, ET AL.--Appeal from 214th District Court of Nueces County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-08-00540-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ RIVER RIDGE NURSING CENTER IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME, ET AL., Appellants, v. GAYLYNNE NEMEC, INDIVIDUALLY, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CATHERINE PARKER, AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF CATHERINE PARKER, ET AL., Appellees. _____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, River Ridge Nursing Center in its assumed or common name, et. al., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 07-4563-F. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that it no longer desires to prosecute their suit against appellees. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 15th day of January, 2009. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
