ROLANDO MARTINEZ CALDERONI v. MARIO R. VILLARREAL AND ANDRES GARCIA GARCIA--Appeal from 357th District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER13-06-688-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

 

ROLANDO MARTINEZ CALDERONI, Appellant,

 
v.

MARIO R. VILLARREAL, ET AL. Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 357th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ROLANDO MARTINEZ CALDERONI, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-10-4976-E. The clerk's record was filed on June 4, 2007, and a supplemental clerk's record was filed on June 14, 2007. No reporter's record was filed. Appellant's brief was due on July 16, 2007. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On August 6, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, appellant's failure to respond, and appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 4th day of October, 2007

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.