Vickie J. Vermillion v. Unifund CCR Partners--Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Montgomery County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-07-00242-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________ _

 

VICKIE J. VERMILLION, Appellant,

 
v.

UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
of Montgomery County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Ya ez, Garza, and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, VICKIE J. VERMILLION, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas, in cause number 05-10-09168. The clerk's record was filed on March 26, 2007. The reporter's record was filed on March 21, 2007. Appellant's brief was due on April 25, 2007. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On June 7, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 23rd day of August, 2007.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.