IN RE: DONNIE RAY PEOPLES--Appeal from County Court of Bee County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-07-032-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

In re:

 

DONNIE RAY PEOPLES

 
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

from Small Claims Court, Precinct No. 1, Bee County, Texas

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Ya ez and Vela
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Vela

This Court's mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals' district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals' jurisdiction. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.221 (Vernon 2004). We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a municipal court judge unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Easton v. Franks, 842 S.W.2d 772, 773 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding); Casner v. Rosas, 943 S.W.2d 937, 938 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1997, orig. proceeding). Relator does not argue that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce this Court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

__________________

ROSE VELA

Justice

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 1st day of February, 2007.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.