In Re: Frank D. Chisholm, #1183067--Appeal from 24th District Court of Calhoun County

Annotate this Case

NUMBER 13-06-00502-CR

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

IN RE FRANK D. CHISHOLM, RELATOR

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Relator, Frank D. Chisholm, an inmate presently incarcerated at the Pack Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division at Navasota, Texas, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this Court to compel the District Clerk of Calhoun County to serve him with Indictment No. 2002-08-5801. We conclude, however, that we do not have jurisdiction to mandamus a district clerk. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004) (governing the scope of the mandamus power of a court of appeals); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce its jurisdiction); see also Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 24.011 (Vernon 2004) (governing the scope of the mandamus power of a district court).

Accordingly, we dismiss relator's petition for want of jurisdiction.

 

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA

Justice

 

Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 15th day of September, 2006.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.