PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROBERT G. NETTLES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HELEN NETTLES, DECEASED, STEPHEN NETTLES & KAREN MENARD--Appeal from 157th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case

NUMBER 13-05-093-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL

  INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

  ROBERT G. NETTLES, INDIVIDUALLY

  AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE

  OF HELEN NETTLES, DECEASED,

STEPHEN NETTLES & KAREN MENARD, Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

On appeal from the 157th District Court

of Harris County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

    Before Justices Castillo, Garza, and Wittig[1]

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 157th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 2001-59368. After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was submitted to the Court, appellant filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and the agreed settlement has now been consummated. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s agreed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant=s agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 15th day of June, 2006.

 

[1] Retired Fourteenth Court of Appeals Justice Don Wittig, assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to the government code. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 74.003 (Vernon 2005).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.