JOHN KNOX VILLAGES OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, INC. AND JANET YANEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FERGUSON WOOD, AND JANICE WOOD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FERGUSON WOOD v. GABRIEL GONZALES, M.D.--Appeal from 139th District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case

NUMBER 13-05-192-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOHN KNOX VILLAGES OF THE LOWER

RIO GRANDE VALLEY, INC., ET AL., Appellants,

v.

GABRIEL GONZALES, M.D., ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Ya ez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, JOHN KNOX VILLAGES OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, INC., ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-202-02-C. The parties in this cause notified this Court that this cause has settled. Currently pending before this Court is a motion to dismiss filed by appellee, Gabriel Gonzales, M.D., and a motion to dismiss filed by appellee/cross-appellant, Janet Yanez, individually and as co-executrix of the Estate of Ferguson Wood, and Janice Wood, individually and as co-executrix of the Estate of Ferguson Wood. Appellant John Knox Villages of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Inc. has filed a response to appellee Gonzales= motion in which it states that it is not opposed to the dismissal of its appeal against Gonzales if plaintiffs= (Yanez-Woods) appeal is also dismissed.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the motions to dismiss the appeal should be granted. The motions to dismiss are granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 9th day of February, 2006.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.