MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS) v. FILBERTO ATKINSON--Appeal from 94th District Court of Nueces County
Annotate this Case
NUMBERS
13-05-750-CV
13-06-015-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_______________________________________________________
MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND
MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS), Appellants,
v.
FILBERTO ATKINSON, Appellee.
_______________________________________________________
On appeal from the 94th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
_______________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Ya ez
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS), ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 05-04515-C. After the clerk=s record was filed, appellants, MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS), filed a motion to dismiss their appeal against appellee, FILBERTO ATKINSON. Appellants state that they no longer wish to prosecute their appeal against appellee, FILBERTO ATKINSON. The appeal of appellants, MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS), and appellee, FILBERTO ATKINSON, is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-06-015-CV.
Having considered appellants=s motion to dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion to dismiss the appeal of appellants, MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS), and appellee, FILBERTO ATKINSON, is hereby granted. The appeal of appellants, MARSH USA, INC. (DELAWARE) AND MARSH USA, INC. (TEXAS), and appellee, FILBERTO ATKINSON, in cause number 13-06-015-CV is ordered DISMISSED.
The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-05-750-CV.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 26th day of January, 2006.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.