EMMA NUNEZ, ET AL. v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION AND SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC.--Appeal from 319th District Court of Nueces County

Annotate this Case

NUMBERS

  13-05-635-CV

  13-06-014-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________

  EMMA NUNEZ, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION AND

SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., Appellees.

_________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Ya ez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, EMMA NUNEZ, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-05717-G. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellants filed motions to dismiss the appeal as to appellees, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC. Appellants request that this Court dismiss their appeal against appellees, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC. Appellants= appeal against appellees, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-06-014-CV.

Having considered appellants= motions to dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motions should be granted. The motions to dismiss appellants= appeal against appellees, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., are hereby granted. The appeal against appellees, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., in cause number 13-06-014-CV is ordered DISMISSED. The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-05-635-CV.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of January, 2006.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.