UNITED PLASTICS GROUP, INC. v. MICROTHERM, INC., MAVID MAQUILADORA, S.A., AND DAVID E. SEITZ, INDIVIDUALLY--Appeal from 357th District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case

NUMBERS

  13-05-281-CV

  13-05-764-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________

  UNITED PLASTICS GROUP, INC., Appellant,

v.

MICROTHERM, INC., ET AL., Appellees.

_________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 357th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, United Plastics Group, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2002-03-0933-E. After the record was filed, Appellant, United Plastics Group, Inc., filed a motion to dismiss its appeal against appellees, Microtherm, Inc., Mavid Maquiladora, S.A., and David E. Seitz, Individually. Appellant states that it no longer wishes to prosecute its appeal against appellees, Microtherm, Inc., Mavid Maquiladora, S.A., and David E. Seitz, Individually. The appeal between United Plastics Group, Inc. and Microtherm, Inc., Mavid Maquiladora, S.A., and David E. Seitz, Individually, is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-05-764-CV.

Having considered appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion to dismiss the appeal between appellant, United Plastics Group, Inc., and appellees, Microtherm, Inc., Mavid Maquiladora, S.A., and David E. Seitz, Individually, is hereby granted. The appeal in cause number 13-05-764-CV is ordered DISMISSED.

The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-05-281-CV.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 12th day of January, 2006.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.