ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ, AND JUAN HERNANDEZ v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. AND BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, ET AL.--Appeal from 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case

NUMBERS

 13-04-412-CV

 13-05-415-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ,

 AND JUAN HERNANDEZ, Appellants,

v.

BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. AND BRIDGESTONE

CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellees.

On appeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Rodriguez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, ARELY HERNANDEZ, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-093-02-F. After the record and briefs were filed, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal as to appellants, ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ, AND JUAN HERNANDEZ, and appellees, BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. AND BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, ET AL. Appellants, ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ, AND JUAN HERNANDEZ, move that this Court dismiss them from the instant appeal. The appeal between appellants, ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ, AND JUAN HERNANDEZ, and appellees, BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. AND BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, ET AL., is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-05-415-CV.

Having considered the joint motion to dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss the appeal of appellants, ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ, AND JUAN HERNANDEZ, is hereby granted. The appeal as to appellants, ARELY HERNANDEZ, OLVIDO HERNANDEZ, AND JUAN HERNANDEZ, and appellees, BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. AND BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, ET AL., in cause number 13-05-415-CV is ordered DISMISSED.

The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-04-412-CV.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 14th day of July, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.