ARTURO CAVAZOS, ET AL. v. VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.--Appeal from 103rd District Court of Cameron County
Annotate this CaseNUMBERS
13-04-529-CV
13-05-207-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________________
ARTURO CAVAZOS, ET AL., Appellants,
v.
VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 103rd District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, ARTURO CAVAZOS, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number C-2003-08-4352-D. The parties have filed a joint motion to sever and dismiss the appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS. Appellants state that they no longer wish to prosecute their appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS. Appellants appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS, is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-05-207-CV.
Having considered the joint motion to sever and dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion to sever and dismiss appellants appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS, is hereby granted. The appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS, in cause number 13-05-207-CV is ordered DISMISSED.
The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-04-529-CV.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 7th day of April, 2005.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.