Jimmy R. Beaumont v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District, et al.--Appeal from 128th District Court of Orange County

Annotate this Case

NUMBER 13-01-253-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

  JIMMY R. BEAUMONT, Appellant,

v.

WEST ORANGE-COVE CONSOLIDATED

  INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 128th District Court

of Orange County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Dorsey, Hinojosa, and Rodriguez

Opinion by Justice Rodriguez

 

Appellant, Jimmy R. Beaumont, brings this appeal following a default judgment against him for delinquent property taxes owed on several parcels of real estate. By four points of error, Beaumont contends his constitutional right to due process was violated due to the addition of interest, penalties, and attorney fees to his back taxes. We affirm.

As this is a memorandum opinion not designated for publication, and the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not recite them here. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.1.

A party to a lawsuit is required to file a motion for new trial if he intends to appeal a point on which evidence must be heard, including a failure to set aside a default judgment. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 324(b)(1). According to the record on appeal, Beaumont did not file a motion for new trial in accordance with rule 324(b)(1). Additionally, critical facts pertaining to Beaumont=s argument regarding the constitutionality of the added interest, penalties, and attorney fees are missing due to his failure to file a motion for new trial. Therefore, due to this failure, Beaumont has waived his right to complain on appeal. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 324(b)(1).

Accordingly, the trial court=s judgment is affirmed.

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

Justice

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P.47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this 3rd day of July, 2002.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.