Tzu-Chen Lin v. Chuan-Ben Fu Appeal from 353rd District Court of Travis County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00540-CV Tzu-Chen Lin, Appellant v. Chuan-Ben Fu, Appellee FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-21-002853, THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Tzu-Chen Lin seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of her plea to the jurisdiction, which she filed in response to appellee Chuan-Ben Fu’s suit for divorce. This Court’s appellate jurisdiction is limited to appeals of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 51.012, .014; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). There is no statutory authority generally permitting an interlocutory appeal from a trial court order denying a plea to the jurisdiction. Great Sw. Reg’l Ctr., LLC v. ACSWD, LP, No. 03-17-000359-CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 8156, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 25, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). Although Section 51.014 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code expressly authorizes an interlocutory appeal from a trial court order that “grants or denies a plea to the jurisdiction by a governmental unit,” nothing in the record suggests that appellant is a “governmental unit.” See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(a)(8); HWY 3 MHP, LLC v. Electric Reliability Council of Tex., 462 S.W.3d 204, 212 (Tex. App.—Austin 2015, no pet.) (concluding that ERCOT is not “governmental unit” and dismissing interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction). On September 27, 2022, the Clerk of this Court advised appellant that it appears this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction over this matter because the clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment or appealable order. The Clerk requested that appellant file a response by October 21, 2022, demonstrating how we may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. To date, no response has been filed. Because no final judgment has been signed and because the trial court’s denial of appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction is a non-appealable interlocutory order, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). __________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: November 18, 2022 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
