Ali Faris v. Travis Park Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Travis County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00495-CV Ali Faris, Appellant v. Travis Park, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-22-001101, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 12, 2022, appellant Ali Faris filed a notice of appeal. Faris appeals from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 21, 2022. Because the judgment was signed on June 21, 2022, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before July 21, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within 30 days after judgment is signed). That July 21, 2022 deadline might have been extended until August 5, 2022, if Faris had filed either a notice of appeal with the trial court or a motion for extension of time with this Court within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See id. R. 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (Tex. 1997) (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule 41(a)(2) [now Rule 26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.”). On September 21, 2022, after an initial review of the clerk’s record, the Clerk of this Court sent Faris a letter informing her that the Court appears to lack jurisdiction over the appeal for the reasons stated above and requesting a response informing us of any basis that exists for jurisdiction. Faris’s response does not present any information that allows the Court to extend the deadline to file the notice of appeal. Faris’s August 12, 2022 notice of appeal is untimely, and we therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b) (providing that filing notice of appeal invokes appellate court’s jurisdiction); id. R. 2 (establishing that appellate court may not alter time for perfecting appeal in civil case). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. R. 42.3(a). __________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justice Triana, and Justice Smith Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: October 18, 2022 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
