The Hertz Corporation v. Chandra Oglen Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Bell County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00280-CV The Hertz Corporation, Appellant v. Chandra Oglen, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 90538, THE HONORABLE JEANNE PARKER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant’s brief was originally due on July 25, 2022. After this Court granted multiple motions requesting an extension of time to file appellant’s brief, the brief was due on November 30, 2022, per the Court’s October 31, 2022 order. To date, the brief has not been tendered for filing and is overdue. On December 2, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a third motion for extension of time, requesting an extension until January 30, 2023. In the Court’s October 31, 2022 order granting the most recent extension, this Court advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted. Accordingly, we deny the third motion for extension of time and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: December 13, 2022
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
