Robert Joseph Yezak Appeal from 296th District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00050-CV Robert Joseph Yezak, Appellant v. Benitia J. Yezak, Appellee FROM THE 296TH DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY NO. 296-52069-2020, THE HONORABLE JOHN R. ROACH, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION In January 2022, this Court received appellant Robert Joseph Yezak’s notice of appeal purporting to appeal from the trial court’s order “granting nonsuit in cause number 36,677 in Milam County.” The district clerk from Milam County has provided this Court with a copy of an August 2020 order transferring the underlying suit from Milam County to Collin County. On April 8, 2022, this Court notified appellant that it appeared that this Court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it arises out of a case from Collin County. See Tex. Gov. Code § 22.201(d) (listing counties within Third Court of Appeals District), (f) (listing counties, including Collin County, within Fifth Court of Appeals District). We requested a response from appellant, asking him to explain how we may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant has filed a response, but he has failed to demonstrate this Court’s jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant states that he is appealing “the decision of the Milam County Court to transfer the case out of Milam County,” but he concedes that the case was transferred. Because the underlying suit was pending in Collin County when appellant filed his notice of appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: June 10, 2022 We further observe that to the extent appellant seeks to appeal the Milam County trial court’s transfer order as an interlocutory appeal, his notice of appeal would not be timely, see Tex. R. App. P. 26(b) (requiring notice of accelerated appeal to be filed within 20 days after order is signed), and even if it had been timely filed, the transfer order is not subject to interlocutory appeal, see Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 15.064(a) (providing that there is no interlocutory appeal from trial court’s venue determinations); Tex. R. Civ. P. 87(6) (providing that “[t]here shall be no interlocutory appeals from [a determination on a motion to transfer venue]”). 1 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
