Robert Joseph Yezak v. Jeana A. Riley Appeal from 20th District Court of Milam County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00466-CV Robert Joseph Yezak, Appellant v. Jeana A. Riley, Appellee FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY NO. CV40,354, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Robert Joseph Yezak filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s September 1, 2020 order denying appellant’s request for a temporary restraining order. Upon initial review, the Clerk of this Court sent Yezak a letter informing him that this Court appears to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because our jurisdiction is limited to appeals in which there exists a final or appealable judgment, or in the case of an interlocutory order, there is a statute that provides for an interlocutory appeal. An order denying a request for temporary restraining order is neither. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.012; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that appeal generally may only be taken from final judgment that disposes of all pending parties and claims in record unless statute provides for interlocutory appeal); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998) (“Appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction.”); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (specifically permitting appeal of various interlocutory orders but not permitting appeal from grant or denial of temporary restraining order). The Clerk requested a response on or before December 10, 2020, informing this Court of any basis that exists for jurisdiction. To date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, for the reasons explained above, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). __________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: December 30, 2020 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
