Ex parte Daniel Lee Miller Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Williamson County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00124-CR NO. 03-16-00137-CR Ex parte Daniel Lee Miller FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, NOS. 15-00262-2A & 14-03937-2A, THE HONORABLE DAVID L. HODGES, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Daniel Lee Miller appeals the denial of his applications for writ of habeas corpus seeking release from jail after the trial court ordered him transferred to a therapeutic mental health facility for the purpose of competency restoration treatment. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 11.05, 11.09 (provisions relating to habeas corpus applications by person confined on misdemeanor charge); see also id. art. 46B.073(b)(1) (provision concerning commitment for restoration to competency for defendant charged with misdemeanor). Since the filing of these appeals, this Court has received two supplemental clerk’s records in each case. The first supplemental record contains documentation that indicates that appellant was transferred to the Austin State Hospital for competency restoration treatment, and that the court ordered an extension of his commitment for further evaluation and treatment to obtain competency upon the hospital’s request. Thus, the record reflects that appellant received the relief he sought in his applications for writ of habeas corpus. The second supplemental record contains an order signed by the trial court, which granted the State’s motion to dismiss the underlying pending criminal case.1 Because the charges against him have been dismissed, appellant is no longer subject to pretrial confinement or commitment for competency restoration. For the above reasons, the appeals of the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s pretrial applications for writ of habeas corpus have been rendered moot. Therefore, we dismiss these appeals as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see also Alexander v. State, No. 03-13-00337-CR, 2014 WL 3562719, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin July 18, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field Dismissed as Moot Filed: June 29, 2016 Do Not Publish 1 The stated reason for seeking the dismissal in each case is “in the interest of justice” because “[d]efendant found incompetent to stand trial and unable to regain competency.” 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
