Rosalind Isaac v. Midfirst Bank Appeal from County Court at Law #4 of Williamson County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00190-CV Rosalind Isaac, Appellant v. Midfirst Bank, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 14-0056-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Rosalind Isaac filed a pro se brief on October 14, 2014. On November 5, 2014, we ordered Isaac to file an amended brief complying with the formal and substantive rules of appellate procedure on or before December 4, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1; Bolling v. Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist., 315 S.W.3d 893, 896 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (“To comply with rule 38.1(f) [of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure], an appellant must articulate the issue we will be asked to decide.”). In our order , we cautioned Isaac that her failure to comply could result in the striking of her brief and the dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. To date, Isaac has not complied with or otherwise responded to this Court’s order. Accordingly, we strike Isaac’s brief and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Bolling, 315 S.W.3d at 897 (dismissing pro se appeal for failure to comply with briefing requirements after opportunity to cure deficiencies). __________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field Dismissed Filed: December 18, 2014 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
