Rockelle LaShawn Parker v. The State of TexasAppeal from 27th District Court of Bell County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00540-CR Rockelle LaShawn Parker, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 62845, HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Rockelle LaShawn Parker pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. However, the district court suspended imposition of the sentence and placed Parker on community supervision for ten years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to revoke, alleging that Parker had violated the terms and conditions of her community supervision by committing the offense of robbery and by failing to pay various community-supervision fees. Parker pleaded true to the allegations that she had failed to pay the fees but not true to the allegation that she had committed robbery. After hearing evidence, the district court found that the allegations were true, revoked Parker s community supervision, and sentenced her to eight years imprisonment. This appeal followed. In a single point of error, Parker argues that the judgment revoking her community supervision should be modified to reflect that she pleaded not true to the allegation that she had committed the offense of robbery. In its brief, the State concedes error. This Court has the authority to modify incorrect judgments when the necessary information is available to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); French v. State, 830 S.W.2d 607, 609 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Accordingly, we sustain Parker s sole point of error. We modify the judgment to reflect that she pleaded not true to paragraph A of the motion to revoke and true to paragraphs B, C, and D of the motion to revoke. As modified, the judgment revoking community supervision is affirmed. __________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed Filed: June 7, 2013 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
