Mark Polansky and Landrah Polansky v. Pezhman Berenji and John Berenjy--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Williamson County (concurring)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00592-CV Mark Polansky and Landrah Polansky, Appellants v. Pezhman Berenji and John Berenjy, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 10-1472-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING CONCURRING OPINION I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in purporting to grant summary judgment for appellees as to the Polanskys claims because the merits of those claims had previously been rendered moot by their nonsuit. Also, because no evidence supported the attorney s fee award against the Polanskys, I agree that appellees must take nothing on that claim. For these reasons, I concur in the judgment. __________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Henson Filed: December 7, 2012
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
