Appellants, Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C. // Cross-Appellants, J. Black's, L.P. and J. Black's, G.P., L.L.C. v. Appellees, J. Black's, L.P. and J. Black's, G.P., L.L.C. // Cross-Appellees, Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C.--Appeal from 345th District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00024-CV Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C., Appellants // J. Black s, L.P. and J. Black s, G.P., L.L.C., Cross-Appellants v. J. Black s, L.P. and J. Black s, G.P., L.L.C., Appellees // Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C., Cross-Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-09-001436, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellees J. Black s, L.P. and J. Black s G.P., L.L.C. have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and their own cross-appeal, asserting that the trial court has granted a motion for new trial in this cause and that no final or otherwise appealable order has been issued. In their written response to this motion, appellants Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C. agree that the trial court has not yet rendered a final judgment and that the notice of appeal is premature. This Court s jurisdiction is limited to the review of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders signed by the trial court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. ยงยง 51.012, .014 (West 2008); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly, we grant the appellees motion and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. ___________________________________________ Diane M. Henson, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: June 28, 2011 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
