George H. Gage v. Ava Arthur and Taneil Gage--Appeal from Probate Court No. 1 of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COUR T OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00111-CV George H. Gage, Appellant v. Ava Arthur and Taneil Gage, Appellees FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 78,585, HONORABLE GUY S. HERMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 30, 2005, this Court sustained the contest to appellant George Gage s affidavit of indigence. See Gage v. Gage, No. 03-05-00111-CV, slip op. at 1 (Tex. App. Austin June 30, 2005, order). Appellant was directed to pay our filing fees and to pay for or make payment arrangements for the clerk s record and reporter s record in this cause.1 Id. at 3. Appellant was given thirty days to comply with the order or face dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c), 37.3(b); see also Olympus/Nelson Prop. Mgmt., 97 S.W.3d 350, 353 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, order). Appellant has not complied with our order. The record has not been filed nor 1 Those portions of the record relating only to the affidavit of indigence were prepared and filed without prepayment. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 738-39 (Tex. 1998). Because the order sustained the contest to the affidavit, appellant was ordered to pay for those records, which he has not done. have payment arrangements for the record been made. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), 37.3(b). __________________________________________ W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: October 21, 2005 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
