TLF 2003 d/b/a or fdba The Madison Commercial Group, et al. v. Texas Commercial Energy--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Travis County

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00313-CV TLF 2003 d/b/a or f/d/b/a The Madison Commercial Group, et al., Appellants v. Texas Commercial Energy, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 282,767, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION This Court has received a copy of a Suggestion of Bankruptcy filed in the trial court by The Madison Commercial Group, stating that Powers Companies, Inc. d/b/a Madison Commercial Group filed for bankruptcy on April 26, 2005. Appellants informed this Court that Powers Companies, Inc. owned The Madison Commercial Group, which is the primary Appellant in this case, and that a stay is proper under 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a) (West 2004). Appellee responds that: The Madison Commercial Group did not appear to be a legal entity; if it were, it was not a party to this cause; and [e]ach of the Defendant/Appellants in this cause was alleged by Plaintiff to being [sic] doing business as The Madison Commercial Group, but no such entity is separately named. Appellee asserts that the bankruptcy filing of Powers Companies, Inc. should not result in a stay in this cause. Due to the apparent confusion as to the nature of The Madison Commercial Group, its relationship to the individual appellants, and the relationship of Powers Companies, Inc. to the parties and this cause, we abate the appeal. Any party wishing to reinstate the appeal should provide this Court with an order from the bankruptcy court determining that the suggestion of bankruptcy does not apply to this case and therefore there is no applicable stay under 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a). __________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Filed: October 19, 2005 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.