Michelle McGaughy v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services--Appeal from 353rd District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00492-CV Michelle McGaughy, Appellant v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. FM100802, HONORABLE CHARLES CAMPBELL, JUDGE PRESIDING Appellee Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services1 has filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, contending that appellant Michelle McGaughy=s notice of appeal was late. We agree and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 1 The Children=s Rights Clinic, attorney ad litem for the children, also filed a motion to dismiss. Appeals in termination cases have been classified as accelerated appeals since September 1, 2001. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. ' 109.002(a) (West Supp. 2002).2 The judgment in this cause was signed June 20, 2002. The notice of appeal was due July 10, 2002, twenty days after the judgment was signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). Any motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal was due July 25, 2002, fifteen days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant=s notice of appeal and motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal were not filed until August 2, 2002. Because the perfecting instrument and motion for extension of time were filed after the deadline for the motion for extension, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Kinnard v. Carnahan, 25 S.W.3d 266, 268 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2000, no pet.). The appellate court may not alter the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case. See Tex. R. App. P. 2. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.3 Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Mack Kidd, Justice Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: August 30, 2002 2 3 The statute applies to appeals in suits pending on or filed on or after September 1, 2001. Appellant=s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is dismissed. 2 Do Not Publish 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
