The State of Texas v. Aaron Lagunas--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Comal County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00059-CR State of Texas, Appellant v. Aaron Lagunas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2001CR1734, HONORABLE BRENDA CHAPMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING The State seeks to appeal an order by the county court at law granting appellee Aaron Lagunas s motion to suppress evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp. 2002). We will dismiss the appeal for noncompliance with article 44.01. The elected prosecuting attorney not an assistant must personally supervise and authorize appeals pursuant to article 44.01. State v. Muller, 829 S.W.2d 805, 810 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). To comply with the statute, the elected prosecuting attorney must either physically sign the notice of appeal or personally instruct and authorize a subordinate to do so. Id. The notice of appeal in this cause was signed by the assistant criminal district attorney. The statement in the notice of appeal that the State is acting by and through its Criminal District Attorney of Comal County is not adequate to fulfill the statutory requirement. Id. at 811. In an appeal from an order granting a motion to suppress, the elected prosecuting attorney must also certify that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay and that the evidence in question is of substantial importance to the State. Art. 44.01(a)(5). In this cause, the certification is signed by the assistant criminal district attorney and therefore does not satisfy this additional statutory requirement. Muller, 829 S.W.2d at 809; State v. Brown, 843 S.W.2d 267, 268 (Tex. App. Austin 1992, no pet.). The State did not properly perfect its appeal within the fifteen days in which it is allowed to make an appeal. Art. 44.01(d); see Muller, 829 S.W.2d at 812; State v. Demaret, 764 S.W.2d 857, 858 (Tex. App. Austin 1989, no pet.). This defect cannot be cured by later amendment. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 412-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: April 11, 2002 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
