Randy Hale v. Fort Worth Independent School District; and Felipe Alanis, Commissioner of Education of the State of Texas--Appeal from 126th District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00489-CV Randy Hale, Appellant v. Fort Worth Independent School District; and Felipe Alanis, Commissioner of Education, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN-00-1040, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Randy Hale appeals the district court s affirmance of the dismissal by appellee Felipe Alanis,1 Commissioner of Education, of Hale s appeal of the appellee Fort Worth Independent School District s ( FWISD ) decision not to extend his employment contract as a maintenance foreman. Hale requests on appeal that the judgment of the district court be reversed and that the case be remanded to the Commissioner of Education for consideration and determination of Hale s breach of contract claim on the merits. The district court, however, in its final judgment in this cause ordered that Hale s cause of action for breach of contract against Fort Worth ISD is 1 Jim Nelson was the Commissioner of Education when this appeal was submitted; he has since resigned. Felipe Alanis was sworn in as Commissioner of Education on March 25, 2002 and is automatically substituted as appellee. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(a). severed and assigned cause number GN101501. The court stated that its judgment in the original cause of action was final and appealable. Hale filed a notice of appeal in cause number GN001040, the cause number of the original cause of action. There is no indication in the docket sheet or otherwise that this cause and the severed cause of action were later consolidated. Hale does not challenge the severance on appeal, and the record contains no final judgment in the severed cause. Because Hale s arguments in his brief and requested relief deal solely with the breachof-contract claim that was expressly severed from the original cause of action now on appeal to this Court, and he otherwise presents no argument or alleged error involving claims other than the severed cause, we affirm the judgment. Lee Yeakel, Justice Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson Affirmed Filed: April 4, 2002 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
