John Allen McGlumphy v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 253rd District Court of Liberty County

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-97-00686-CR
John Allen McGlumphy, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LIBERTY COUNTY, 253RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 21,750, HONORABLE W.G. WOODS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM

The district court found appellant guilty of aggravated assault and assessed punishment at imprisonment for sixteen years. Tex. Penal Code Ann. 22.02 (West 1994). Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's brief would serve no beneficial purpose.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

 

Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Aboussie and Jones

Affirmed

Filed: August 13, 1998

Do Not Publish