Felix Salinas v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 218th District Court of Karnes County

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-97-00465-CR
Felix Salinas, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF KARNES COUNTY, 218TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 94-06-00052-CRK, HONORABLE OLIN B. STRAUSS, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM

After accepting appellant's guilty plea, the district court found him guilty of aggravated assault and assessed punishment at imprisonment for ten years, but suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision. Later, on the State's motion, the court revoked supervision and imposed sentence.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

 

Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith

Affirmed

Filed: March 12, 1998

Do Not Publish