Sam Rogers, Mattie Everett, Clara Rogers, J. S. Simpson, Jessie Ann Bullard and Janie Richardson v. Frank Garrett, Jr., Individually and as Pastor of St. Paul Baptist Church, and Anthony King, Individually and as Chairman of the Deacon Board of St. Paul Baptist Church--Appeal from 335th District Court of Lee County

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-92-062-CV
SAM ROGERS, MATTIE EVERETT, CLARA ROGERS, J. S. SIMPSON,
JESSIE ANN BULLARD AND JANIE RICHARDSON,

APPELLANTS

 
vs.
FRANK GARRETT, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PASTOR OF ST. PAUL
BAPTIST CHURCH, AND ANTHONY KING, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
CHAIRMAN OF THE DEACON BOARD OF ST. PAUL BAPTIST CHURCH,

APPELLEES

 
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 8,763, HONORABLE HAROLD R. (BOB) TOWSLEE, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

 

This is a dismissal for want of prosecution.

Generally, an appellant must file his brief within thirty days after the filing of the transcript and statement of facts, if any. Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 74(k) (Pamph. 1992). If the appellant fails to file his brief within the prescribed time, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant shows a reasonable explanation for failing to file the brief and the appellee has not suffered material injury. Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 74(l)(1) (Pamph. 1992).

The statement of facts in this cause was filed on February 26, 1992; the transcript was filed on April 21, 1992. Accordingly, appellants' brief was due thirty days later, on May 21, 1992. Appellants have not filed their brief. Moreover, appellants have not filed a motion for extension of time showing a reasonable explanation for their omission. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 74(n) (Pamph. 1992). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Dickson v. Dickson, 541 S.W.2d 895 (Tex. Civ. App. 1976, writ dism'd w.o.j.).

 

[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith;

Justice Smith not participating]

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 1, 1992

[Do Not Publish]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.