Shaun Fitzpatrick v. The State of Texas Appeal from 361st District Court of Brazos County (memorandum opinion by chief justice gray)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00395-CR SHAUN FITZPATRICK, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 13-02709-CRF-361 MEMORANDUM OPINION Shaun Fitzpatrick appeals the trial court’s judgment of conviction which he contends was signed on May 4, 2016. Fitzpatrick was required to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the date he was sentenced in open court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). His notice of appeal filed by the trial court on November 21, 2016 is untimely. We have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal, and this appeal must be dismissed. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely).1 Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. 2 TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 30, 2016 Do not publish [CR25] 1 Another notice of appeal of the same conviction sent to us by Fitzpatrick in October of 2016 was also dismissed as untimely. See Fitzpatrick v. State, No. 10-16-00341-CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 11578 (Tex. App.—Waco Oct. 26, 2016, no pet.). Because the first notice of appeal, received directly from Fitzpatrick, stated the crime was indecency with a “minor” and because the second notice of appeal, received from the district clerk, stated the crime was indecency with a “child” and because the second notice of appeal was received after the Court’s opinion issued, it initially appeared the second notice of appeal was prepared and filed in response to the earlier issued opinion. Upon further review, it may be that the notice of appeal initially received by the Court was intended as a manually prepared copy of the notice of appeal sent to the district clerk and then forwarded to us. Nevertheless, because the description of the crime in each notice of appeal was different, it caused the Court to conclude the notice of appeal should be separately docketed. A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court’s judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). 2 Fitzpatrick v. State Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
