Ronald Eugene Darwin v. The State of Texas Appeal from 21st District Court of Burleson County (memorandum opinion by chief justice gray)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15-00304-CR RONALD EUGENE DARWIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 14,101 MEMORANDUM OPINION Ronald Eugene Darwin appeals the trial court’s denial of Darwin’s “Motion for Judgement Nunc Pro Tunc on Pre-Sentence Time Credit.” However, the trial court’s denial of that motion is not an appealable order, and this Court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from that order. Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism'd); see also Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (appeal of denial of nunc pro tunc is by way of a petition for writ of mandamus). Accordingly, Darwin’s appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1 TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed September 17, 2015 Do not publish [CR25] A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court’s judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). 1 Darwin v. State Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
