Jimmy Darrell Craig, Jr. v. The State of Texas Appeal from 220th District Court of Hamilton County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15-00027-CR JIMMY DARRELL CRAIG, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 220th District Court Hamilton County, Texas Trial Court No. CR07994 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant filed what appeared to be a pro se interlocutory notice of appeal of the trial court’s denial of his motion for bond reduction. The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that this case was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction and that the Court might dismiss his appeal unless he showed grounds for continuing it. Appellant did not respond to the Clerk’s letter. This Court lacks jurisdiction over a trial court‘s denial of a motion for bond reduction when the appeal is not from the trial court’s denial of a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant sought bond reduction. See Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); see also Sanchez v. State, 340 S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed February 26, 2015 Do not publish [CR25] Craig v. State Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
