Jackie Russell Keeter v. The State of Texas Appeal from 220th District Court of Hamilton County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00310-CV JACKIE RUSSELL KEETER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 220th District Court Hamilton County, Texas Trial Court No. CR06978/CR06361 MEMORANDUM OPINION Jackie Keeter, an inmate, is appealing the trial court’s August 7, 2013 “order to withdraw funds” that notifies the Texas Department of Criminal Justice that Keeter has been assessed court costs, fees, and a fine and instructs the Department to withdraw funds from Keeter’s inmate account in accordance with Texas Government Code section 501.014. Keeter filed a “motion to strike/withdraw void order to withdraw inmate funds dated August 7, 2013 …”, but there is no ruling on that motion in the record to appeal from or for the Court to review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a)(2); Fox v. Maguire, 224 S.W.3d 304, 306 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, pet. denied); see also Brar v. Sedey, 307 S.W.3d 916, 919 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.). Furthermore, the trial court’s August 7, 2013 “order to withdraw funds” is not an order, much less an appealable order; it is a notice to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice under Government Code section 501.014(e). Ramirez v. State, 318 S.W.3d 906, 907-08 (Tex. App.—Waco 2010, no pet.); see Jones v. State, No. 10-1000006-CV, 2011 WL 5221243 (Tex. App.—Waco Oct. 26, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 316 n.1 (Tex. 2009). The Clerk of the Court notified Keeter that, unless he showed grounds for continuing this appeal, it was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because there is no appealable order. Keeter has not done so. We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 30, 2015 [CV06] Keeter v. State Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.