Courtney Me-Sha Franklin v. The State of Texas Appeal from 12th District Court of Walker County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14-00105-CR COURTNEY ME-SHA FRANKLIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 25,574 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Courtney Me-Sha Franklin was adjudicated guilty of the state-jail felony offense of credit card or debit card abuse by the trial court after it found “true” numerous violations of the conditions of her deferred adjudication community supervision. The trial court assessed a two-year sentence, and Appellant appealed. Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although informed of her right to do so, Appellant did not file a pro se response to the Anders brief. In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. We grant appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Appellant. Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Appellant a copy of our decision, notify her of her right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter certifying counsel’s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins (Chief Justice Gray concurs with a note)* Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed December 18, 2014 Do not publish [CR25] Franklin v. State Page 2 *(Chief Justice Gray concurs in the judgment to the extent it affirms the trial court’s judgment. A separate opinion will not issue.) Franklin v. State Page 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
