Kentrell Lamar Fletcher v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 52nd District Court of Coryell County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10-00378-CR KENTRELL LAMAR FLETCHER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. FAM-09-20084 MEMORANDUM OPINION Kentrell Fletcher pled guilty to aggravated assault, a second-degree felony, and received deferred adjudication community supervision for a period of five years. The State later moved to adjudicate Fletcher s guilt, alleging four violations of his conditions of community supervision. Fletcher pled true to all of the allegations. The trial court found that Fletcher violated the conditions of his community supervision, adjudicated him guilty, and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. Fletcher s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Fletcher filed a pro se response; however, he does not raise any arguable issues. The State did not file a brief. We will affirm. In an Anders case, we must, after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is wholly frivolous or without merit when it lacks any basis in law or fact. McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. Counsel must send Fletcher a copy of our decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, at Fletcher s last known address. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. Counsel must also notify Fletcher of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Id.; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We grant counsel s motion to withdraw, effective upon counsel s compliance with the aforementioned notification requirement as evidenced by a letter [to this Court] certifying his compliance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. REX D. DAVIS Justice Fletcher v. State Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed March 21, 2012 Do not publish [CR25] Fletcher v. State Page 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
