Shantacus Carta Clark v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 89th District Court of Wichita County
Annotate this CaseIN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-06-00185-CR
Shantacus Carta Clark,
Appellant
v.
The State of Texas,
Appellee
From the 89th District Court
Wichita County, Texas
Trial Court No. 42,859-C
CONCURRING Opinion
In Villanueva v. State, 209 S.W.3d 239 (Tex. App. Waco 2006, no pet.), the majority made many of the same mistakes which are repeated in their opinion in this case. I explained my disagreement with their procedure in my concurring opinion in that proceeding. Id. at 249-252 (Gray, C.J., concurring). For the same reasons, I concur only in the judgment in this proceeding.[1]
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Concurring opinion delivered and filed August 15, 2007
[1] Also, Mr. Clark, while the majority purports to have you instructed of your right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, this is not accurate. An attorney can also file one on your behalf, but you are not entitled to have counsel appointed to file one for you to be paid for with State or county funds.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.