Apparajan Ganesan v. Becky A. Tibbs, Cynthia A. Wood, Cody W. Ginsel, Jason A. Manuel, John/Jane Doe (multiple) (All Defendants in Personal [Individual] and Official Capacities)--Appeal from 12th District Court of Walker County

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-07-00005-CV

Apparajan Ganesan,

Appellant

v.

Becky A. Tibbs, Cynthia A. Wood,

Cody W. Ginsel, Jason A. Manuel,

John/Jane Doe (multIple) (All

Defendants in Personal [Individual]

and Official Capacities),

Appellees

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23300

MEMORANDUM Opinion

Apparajan Ganesan appeals from an unknown trial court order and various issues from his case below.

The Clerk of this Court warned Ganesan that because it appeared to the Court that the order(s) from which the appeal was (were) taken was interlocutory, the Court may dismiss the appeal unless a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 44.3. Ganesan responded and acknowledged that his issues were interlocutory.

This Court has no jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal except as expressly provided by statute. Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998). No statute expressly authorizes the interlocutory appeal of the issues mentioned in Ganesan s response.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. Tex. R. App. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to Tex. R. App. P., Order Regarding Fees (July 21, 1998). See also Tex. R. App. P. 5; 10th Tex. App. (Waco) Loc. R. 5; Tex. Gov t Code Ann. 51.207(b) (Vernon 2005). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. Tex. R. App. P. 2.

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 14, 2007

[CV06]