Neil Chur, et al. v. Ninfa Lorea, et al.--Appeal from 82nd District Court of Robertson County

Annotate this Case
Neil Chur, et al. v. Ninfa Lorea, et al. /**/

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-00-059-CV

 

NEIL CHUR, ET AL.,

Appellants

v.

 

NINFA LOERA, ET AL.,

Appellees

 

From the 82nd District Court

Robertson County, Texas

Trial Court # 99-09-15,831-CV-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 7, 2000, the parties filed a motion to vacate and render judgment pursuant to settlement. They ask that we dismiss this action with prejudice. In relevant portion, Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

(a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

(1) in accordance with an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk;

(2) in accordance with a motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order; but no party may be prevented from seeking any relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

The motion states that all matters in controversy have been amicably compromised and settled. It is signed by attorneys for both parties.

Therefore, under the authority of Rule 42.1, the judgment is vacated and the case is dismissed. Id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(e). Costs are taxed against the party incurring them.

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Gray

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 20, 2000

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.