Larry Dean McClain v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 66th District Court of Hill County

Annotate this Case
Larry Dean McClain v. State of Texas /**/

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-99-321-CR

 

LARRY DEAN McCLAIN,

Appellant

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

 

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court # 30,297 & 30,393

O P I N I O N

Larry Dean McClain was convicted by the trial court of two offenses of possession of a controlled substance in November of 1995. His sentence was probated. On October 1, 1999, McClain s probation was revoked and he was sentenced to eighteen months in state jail for each offense with credit for time served. McClain has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal supported by Appellant s Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal.

In relevant portion, Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states:

(a) At any time before the appellate court s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal if the appellant withdraws his or her notice of appeal. The appellant and his or her attorney must sign the written withdrawal and file it in duplicate with the appellate clerk, who must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.

 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

We have not issued a decision in this appeal. Appellant s Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal is signed by both McClain and his attorney. The clerk of this court has sent a duplicate copy of Appellant s Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal to the trial court clerk. The requirements of the rule are met. Id. When the requirements of this rule have been met, a formal motion to dismiss is not required, but it does provide an efficient method of bringing the withdrawal of the notice of appeal to this court s attention. See id.

McClain s appeal is dismissed.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Gray

Dismissed on appellant's motion

Opinion delivered and filed April 12, 2000

Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.