Young Materials Corp. v. Ronnie Smith--Appeal from 85th District Court of Brazos County

Annotate this Case
Young Materials Corp. v. Ronnie Smith /**/

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-99-114-CV

 

YOUNG MATERIALS CORP.,

Appellant

v.

 

RONNIE SMITH,

Appellee

 

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court # 47,763

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Young Materials Corporation, Appellant, and Ronnie Smith, Appellee, have filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss Entire Cause which states that the parties have settled the disputes underlying this appeal. In this motion, the parties ask us to vacate the judgment of the trial court and dismiss the appeal and the entire cause. We grant the parties motion.

This Court has previously held that we had no authority to vacate a trial court s judgment. Rothlander v. Ayala, 943 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. App. Waco 1997, no writ). Since Rothlander, the appellate rules have changed.

Now, Rule 43.2 specifically gives us authority to vacate the trial court s judgment and dismiss the case. The rule provides as follows:

43.2 Types of Judgment. The court of appeals may:

(a) affirm the trial court's judgment in whole or in part;

(b) modify the trial court's judgment and affirm it as modified;

(c) reverse the trial court's judgment in whole or in part and render the judgment that the trial court should have rendered;

(d) reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case for further proceedings;

(e) vacate the trial court's judgment and dismiss the case; or

(f) dismiss the appeal.

 

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2.

Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a) we are given the authority to grant the relief agreed to by the parties. This rule provides as follows:

42.1 Voluntary Dismissal in Civil Cases.

(a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

(1) in accordance with an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk; or

(2) in accordance with a motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order; but no party may be prevented from seeking any relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The parties have requested us to vacate the trial court s judgment and dismiss the entire case, an option that is specifically authorized by Rule 43.2(e). The motion of the parties is granted.

CONCLUSION

The trial court s judgment is vacated and the case is dismissed. Each party is assessed the costs it incurred.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Gray

Trial court judgment vacated, and case dismissed.

Opinion delivered and filed October 13, 1999.

Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.