Derek Tressler v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 220th District Court of Hamilton County

Annotate this Case

 

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-98-355-CR

 

DEREK TRESSLER,

Appellant

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

 

From the 220th District Court

Hamilton County, Texas

Trial Court # 6663A

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

In 1993, Appellant Derek Tressler pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 1994), 22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (2)(B) (Vernon Supp. 1999). Pursuant to a plea agreement, the court placed Tressler on deferred adjudication probation for ten years on the aggravated sexual assault charge. // In August 1998, the State filed a motion to adjudicate Tressler s guilt. He pleaded true to the allegations of the motion in a hearing on December 1, and the court adjudicated him guilty of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment. Tressler filed a general notice of appeal on December 8.

An appellant who has pleaded guilty in exchange for deferred adjudication probation must comply with appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) when he seeks to appeal a subsequent adjudication and sentencing. See Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (applying former appellate rule 40(b)(1)); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Tressler s general notice of appeal does not comply with this rule. We notified him of this defect by letter dated January 27, 1999. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). He has not responded to our letter by filing an amended notice of appeal in compliance with rule 25.2(b)(3).

Because Tressler s notice of appeal does not comply with rule 25.2(b)(3), we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Okigbo v. State, 960 S.W.2d 923, 925 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref d); Carothers v. State, 928 S.W.2d 315, 317 (Tex. App. Beaumont 1996, pet. ref d). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Gray

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 24, 1999

Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.