Michael Lee Keene v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 87th District Court of Freestone County

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-96-208-CR

MICHAEL LEE KEENE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court # 95-119-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 30, 1995, Michael Lee Keene was indicted on one count of retaliation. Tex. Penal Code Ann. 36.06 (Vernon 1994). Pursuant to a plea agreement, Keene, on September 21, pled guilty to the offense, and the trial court entered an order deferring adjudication on the offense for four years and placing Keene on community supervision for those four years.

On February 20, 1996, the State filed a "Motion to Show Cause," alleging that Keene had violated two of the conditions of his community supervision, namely, (1) failing to report to his community supervision officer, and (2) failing to complete his mandatory community service obligations. On July 31, the State filed an amended "Motion to Show Cause," adding an additional allegation that Keene had threatened a person he had been ordered by the terms of his community supervision to avoid.

On August 30, the trial court held a hearing on the State's motion. Upon the close of the hearing, the trial court found that Keene had violated three of the conditions of his community supervision, found him guilty of the original retaliation charge, and sentenced him to seven years' incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division.

Keene filed a notice of appeal of this judgment on September 6, and he filed a motion for new trial on September 30. The trial court granted the motion for new trial on November 7. The transcript was filed in this court on September 16.

On January 21, 1997, Keene filed in this court a motion to dismiss this cause. The motion is signed by Keene, personally, and his attorney.

In relevant part, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59 states:

(b) Criminal Cases. The appeal may be dismissed if the appellant withdraws his notice of appeal at any time prior to the decision of the appellate court. The withdrawal shall be in writing signed by the appellant and his counsel and filed in duplicate with the clerk of the court of appeals in which the appeal is pending[.]

Tex. R. App. P. 59(b).

We have not issued a decision in this appeal. The motion to dismiss is signed personally by Keene and his counsel, as required by the rule. Thus, the motion is granted.

Keene's appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Davis,

Justice Cummings, and

Justice Vance

Appeal dismissed on appellant's motion

Opinion delivered and filed January 29, 1997

Do not publish