Stanford C. Todd v. Christine M. David--Appeal from 52nd District Court of Coryell County

Annotate this Case
Todd v. David /**/

DISMISSED

SEPTEMBER 13, 1990

 

NO. 10-90-116-CV

Trial Court

# 24,503

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT WACO

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

STANFORD C. TODD,

Appellant

v.

 

CHRISTINE M. DAVID,

Appellee

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

From 52nd Judicial District Court

Coryell County, Texas

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

O P I N I O N

 

* * * * * * *

On May 3, 1990, Stanford Todd, Appellant, was held in contempt for failing to pay child support and assessed 78 months in jail and a $6,500 fine. However, on that date the court suspended imposition of the commitment order, and placed him on probation for five years.

Appellant has attempted a direct appeal of the May 3rd order to this court.

A decree of contempt, though probated or suspended, constitutes a restraint on one's liberty. Ex parte Conner, 746 S.W.2d 527 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1988) (abating appeal). Such an order can lead to incarceration and is thus quasi-criminal in nature. Ex parte Conner, 749 S.W.2d 241, 242 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1988, no writ). This court does not have jurisdiction over a direct appeal from such an order. Wagner v. Warnasch, 156 Tex. 334, 295 S.W.2d 890 (1956); Ex parte Dillard, 577 S.W.2d 519, 520 (Tex. Civ. App.--Texarkana 1979, no writ).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.