Michael Charles Fuller v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 6th District Court of Lamar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-08-00131-CR ______________________________ MICHAEL CHARLES FULLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 18771 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Charles Fuller appeals from his convictions by a jury of indecency with a child by contact (count one), indecency with a child by exposure (count two), and sexual assault of a child (count three). See TEX . PENAL CODE ANN . § 21.11 (Vernon 2003), § 22.011 (Vernon Supp. 2008). The jury assessed his punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment on count one, five years' imprisonment on count two (to run consecutive to the sentence in count one), and fifteen years' imprisonment on count three (to run concurrently with the sentences in counts one and two). Fuller was represented by appointed counsel at trial and on appeal. Fuller's attorney has filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit, after a review of the record and the related law. Counsel states that he has studied the record and finds no error preserved for appeal that could be successfully argued. The brief contains a professional evaluation of the record and advances nine arguable grounds for review. This meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel mailed a copy of the brief to Fuller on January 15, 2009, informing Fuller of his right to examine the entire appellate record and to file a pro se response. Counsel simultaneously filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal. Fuller filed his response on May 13, 2009. 2 We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the clerk's record and the reporter's record, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.1 Jack Carter Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: June 3, 2009 June 4, 2009 Do Not Publish 1 Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel's request to withdraw from further representation of Fuller in this case. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Fuller wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Fuller must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Fuller must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that was overruled by this Court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this Court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.4. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
