James Hilton Bond, Jr. v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 276th District Court of Marion County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-06-00168-CR
______________________________
JAMES HILTON BOND, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 276th Judicial District Court
Marion County, Texas
Trial Court No. F13711
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
James Hilton Bond, Jr., appeals from his conviction by the trial court on his plea of guilty to two counts of aggravated robbery. The trial court sentenced Bond to fifty years' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. We dismiss Bond's appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The trial court filed a certification, in accordance with Rule 25.2(a)(2), that this case "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." Rule 25.2(a)(2) states, in pertinent part:
(2) . . . A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.02 and these rules. The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). If a certification showing that the appellant has the right to appeal is not made a part of the appellate record, we must dismiss the case unless the record affirmatively indicates that the appellant may have the right to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for Thirteenth Judicial Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We have examined the clerk's record to determine whether the trial court's certification is defective. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613. Nothing in the record indicates the certification is defective. This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: August 31, 2006
Date Decided: September 1, 2006
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.