Angelo Clark v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law of Harrison County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-05-00270-CR
______________________________
ANGELO CLARK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law
Harrison County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2004-1593
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Angelo Clark attempts to appeal his conviction for speeding. On February 8, 2006, this Court received the clerk's record in this appeal. On review of that record, we noted it did not contain the trial court's certification of Clark's right of appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Rule 25.2 requires that the record on appeal include the trial court's certification of a defendant's right of appeal and requires dismissal of an appeal in which no such certification has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
The Clerk of this Court sent a letter dated February 8, 2006, alerting all parties to this defect in the record and seeking a supplemental clerk's record to include the trial court's certification. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 34.5(c)(1). The letter also reminded the parties that Rule 25.2 authorizes dismissal of the appeal when no certification has been filed. Having received no response, at the end of March, the clerk's office contacted the county clerk's office to check on the status of the supplemental record. We learned that no certification had been filed.
On April 4, 2006, this Court ordered the trial court, within ten days of said order, to enter its certification of Clark's right of appeal. More than ten days have passed, and we have received nothing from the trial court or any party to this matter.
Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d), we hereby dismiss this appeal.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: April 25, 2006
Date Decided: April 26, 2006
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.